Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP661 In re the marriage of: Hust v. Schrank

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 1, 2011//

2010AP661 In re the marriage of: Hust v. Schrank

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 1, 2011//

Listen to this article

Family
Physical placement

Michael L. Schrank has appealed from an order denying his motion for modification of physical placement pertaining to his daughters, Nina and Anna. He also challenges the portion of the trial court’s order requiring him to pay guardian ad litem and expert fees related to this post-divorce litigation. We affirm the trial court’s order. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP661 In re the marriage of: Hust v. Schrank

Dist II, Waukesha County, Kieffer, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Grove, Patricia L., Milwaukee; Kolb, Christopher T., Milwaukee; Foy, Angela Chaput, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Gay, Julie M., Waukesha

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests