Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP2923 Przytarski v. Ackerman

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 1, 2011//

2010AP2923 Przytarski v. Ackerman

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//June 1, 2011//

Listen to this article

Civil Procedure
Entry of judgment

This case has its genesis in an action Stephanie M. Przytarski, p/k/a Stephanie M. Kramschuster, brought against Marc J. Ackerman, Ph.D., in connection with her retention of Ackerman for a then-pending paternity action. Przytarski sued Ackerman, claiming that he breached the contract of retention. The circuit court dismissed Przytarski’s suit. Subsequently, the circuit court (a different judge presiding as the result of judicial rotation), found that Przytarski’s suit against Ackerman was frivolous. Although Przytarski did not timely appeal the circuit court’s dismissal of her action against Ackerman, she did timely appeal the judgment entered on the circuit court’s finding that Przytarski’s action against Ackerman was frivolous. We reversed the judgment that directed Przytarski to pay Ackerman frivolous-action costs. See Kramschuster v. Ackerman, No. 2009AP1002, unpublished slip op. ¶18 (WI App Jan. 26, 2010). This opinion will not be published.

2010AP2923 Przytarski v. Ackerman

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Kahn, J., Fine, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Prztarski, Stephanie M., pro se; For Respondent: Dall’osto, Raymond M., Milwaukee; Keppel, Kathryn A., Milwaukee

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests