Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP1428 Dalka v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 24, 2011//

2010AP1428 Dalka v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//May 24, 2011//

Listen to this article

Employment
Worker’s compensation

An employee who receives worker’s compensation benefits waives his or her unilateral right to a jury trial in a related third-party tort action.

“Ultimately, Bergren held that Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) ‘gives the trial court the right to settle a dispute between the two plaintiffs, as to whether or not a compromise settlement offered by the defendant should be accepted.’ Bergren, 263 Wis. at 485. This language does not differentiate between the plaintiffs, that is, the employee and the worker’s compensation insurer. Reading Bergren as a whole, we conclude its holding must be applied equally as against the employee or the worker’s compensation insurer. We are bound by that holding. See Cook v. Cook, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 189-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997).”

Affirmed.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

2010AP1428 Dalka v. American Family Mutual Ins. Co.

Dist. II, Washington County, Muehlbauer, J., Hoover, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: O’Malley, Anthony L., Fond du Lac; For Respondent: Mathie, James J., Waukesha; Weiss, Monte, Milwaukee; Kramer, Charles W., Milwaukee

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests