Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 10-2740 U.S. v. Yarrington

10-2740 U.S. v. Yarrington

Evidence Rule of completeness Confusing testimony is an insufficient basis to admit otherwise inadmissible evidence under the rule of completeness, but the error was harmless. “The reading of the portions of the report does not seem to fit within the rule of completeness. The jury had already heard that Summerlin stated during his September 8 interview with Agent ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*