By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 20, 2011//
Sentencing
Modification
Devis S. Osinski appeals from a judgment of conviction and an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Osinski argues to this court that he is entitled to be resentenced because (1) the court did not properly explain its reasons for the sentence imposed under State v. Gallion, 2004 WI 42, 270 Wis. 2d 535, 678 N.W.2d 197; (2) a more culpable co-actor received a shorter sentence; and (3) the sentencing court relied on inaccurate information when it sentenced him. We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its sentencing discretion, and affirm the judgment and order. This opinion will not be published.
2009AP2878-CR, 2009AP2879-CR State v. Osinski
Dist II, Walworth County, Race, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Hunt, Edward J., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Koss, Phillip A., Elkhorn; Remington, Christine A., Madison