By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 19, 2011//
By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 19, 2011//
Juveniles
TPR; best interests
Gabriel S. appeals the order terminating his parental rights to Gracious S. He argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it found him unfit because Gracious continued to be a child in need of protection or services. Gabriel S. also contends that the trial court erred when it failed to “properly address each of the six ‘best interests’” factors enumerated in Wis. Stat. § 48.426(3) when it found that it was in Gracious’s best interests to have his parental rights terminated. This court disagrees with both contentions and affirms. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP2876 In re the termination of parental rights to Gracious S.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Foley, J., Curley, P.J.
Attorneys: For Appellant: Earle, Jane S., Shorewood; For Respondent: Sweeney, Sarah A., Wauwatosa; Saltzwadel, Crystal L., Milwaukee