2010AP1834 State ex rel. Whiteside v. Boatwright, et al.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 14, 2011//

Listen to this article

Prisons
Prison discipline

Ramiah Whiteside, pro se, challenges Wisconsin Department of Corrections decisions regarding an inmate conduct report. Whiteside argues: (1) the evidence was insufficient; (2) the adjustment committee failed to adequately explain its reasons for the discipline imposed; (3) the adjustment committee was not impartial; (4) he was denied his right to appeal a version of the adjustment committee’s decision that corrected one word; (5) he was denied his right to view and use video evidence in his defense; and (6) he was not provided copies of confidential informant statements. We reject each of Whiteside’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1834 State ex rel. Whiteside v. Boatwright, et al.

Dist IV, Dane County, Foust, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Whiteside, Ramiah Abiyah, pro se; For Respondent: Potter, Kevin C., Madison; Keckhaver, Karla Z., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event