Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

09-3954, 09-3961 & 10-1204 U.S. v. Lewis

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 6, 2011//

09-3954, 09-3961 & 10-1204 U.S. v. Lewis

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//April 6, 2011//

Listen to this article

Firearms
Carrying firearm in connection with a drug offense

The evidence was sufficient to convict the defendants of conspiring to carry a firearm in connection with a drug trafficking offense, where the defendants planned to steal drugs from a stash house.

“[T]he jury could have disbelieved Gomez’s testimony as to events on January 4 and still have found Lewis and Williams guilty of the § 924(c) count. To support a conviction under § 924(c), the government was required to prove that the defendant: (1) conspired to possess a controlled substance with intent to distribute; and (2) either knowingly possessed or carried a firearm in furtherance of, or during and in relation to this conspiracy, or could reasonably foresee that one of his coconspirators would carry a firearm. United States v. McLee, 436 F.3d 751, 758 (7th Cir. 2006). Here, the jury could have discounted Gomez’s testimony regarding January 4 and still have found that Williams and Lewis could reasonably have foreseen that someone would carry a gun, given the multiple recorded conversations in which the two discussed plans for a violent robbery of the stash house and ways to procure weapons for the robbery. Accordingly, the evidence was sufficient to convict both Williams and Lewis under § 924(c).”

Affirmed.

09-3954, 09-3961 & 10-1204 U.S. v. Lewis

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Kendall, J., Evans, J.

Full Text

Polls

Should Hollywood and Nashville stay out of politics?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests