Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 2010AP909-CR State v. Eison

2010AP909-CR State v. Eison

Evidence Spousal privilege; harmless error Even though it was ineffective for counsel to fail to properly assert the marital privilege, the error was harmless. “Had the select portions of Reynolds’ testimony that were privileged marital communications (the agreement that Reynolds would pick Eison up from work and Eison’s claim that his employer wasn’t paying him) not been included, ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*