By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//March 1, 2011//
Evidence
Jury questions; reading transcripts
Gerrit Van Doorn appeals a judgment, entered on a jury verdict, convicting him of operating while intoxicated, fifth offense; operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration, fifth offense; operating after revocation; and resisting or obstructing an officer. Van Doorn argues the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion when it read back a portion of the arresting officer’s testimony in response to a jury question. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP1614-CR State v. Van Doorn
Dist III, Eau Claire County, Gabler, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Morin, Peter J., Menomonie; For Respondent: White, Glenn R., Eau Claire; Lloyd, Katherine Desmond, Madison