Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP906-CR State v. Bonilla

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 23, 2011//

2010AP906-CR State v. Bonilla

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 23, 2011//

Listen to this article

2d-degree RES
Sufficiency of the evidence

A jury found Gabiel Bonilla guilty of second-degree recklessly endangering safety and disorderly conduct, both while using a dangerous weapon and as a habitual offender. On appeal, Bonilla challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the reckless endangerment conviction. Because the State presented evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer Bonilla’s actions created an unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm to another human being and Bonilla was aware of that risk, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP906-CR State v. Bonilla

Dist III, Brown County, Zuidmulder, J., Per Curiam

Attorney: For Appellant: Ewald-Herrick, Elizabeth, Merton; For Respondent: Zakowski, John P., Green Bay; Kinnunen, Erik, Madison

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests