By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 23, 2011//
2d-degree RES
Sufficiency of the evidence
A jury found Gabiel Bonilla guilty of second-degree recklessly endangering safety and disorderly conduct, both while using a dangerous weapon and as a habitual offender. On appeal, Bonilla challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting the reckless endangerment conviction. Because the State presented evidence from which the jury could reasonably infer Bonilla’s actions created an unreasonable and substantial risk of death or great bodily harm to another human being and Bonilla was aware of that risk, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP906-CR State v. Bonilla
Dist III, Brown County, Zuidmulder, J., Per Curiam
Attorney: For Appellant: Ewald-Herrick, Elizabeth, Merton; For Respondent: Zakowski, John P., Green Bay; Kinnunen, Erik, Madison