Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 10-2343 U.S. v. Snodgrass

10-2343 U.S. v. Snodgrass

Sentencing Discretion Where the judge gave a thorough written explanation for the sentence, the sentence is affirmed, even though the oral remarks at the sentencing hearing were inadequate. “We caution, however, that name-calling is not a substitute for reasoned analysis. Regardless of the heinous nature of the crime, every defendant is entitled to a reasoned explanation of his ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*