Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2009AP1881 S.P.A. v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 8, 2011//

2009AP1881 S.P.A. v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//February 8, 2011//

Listen to this article

Schools
Confidential pupil records

A court need not wait until trial to disclose pupil records and may instead base its decision on the review of deposition testimony; and a court need not include language in the order limiting the records’ use.

“First and foremost, we observe the statute twice refers to an action, which is a much broader term than trial. An action commences when a summons and complaint have been filed with the court. See Wis. Stat. § 801.02. ‘“[A]ction” is used in … the civil procedure statutes to refer to an entire proceeding, not to one or more parts within a proceeding.’ State ex rel. Henderson v. Raemisch, 2010 WI App 114, ¶¶22-24, _ Wis. 2d _, 790 N.W.2d 242 (holding that, consistent with other contexts, in prisoner litigation cases, action refers to an entire proceeding). A witness who has been deposed ‘has testified in the action.’ See Wis. Stat. § 118.125(2)(f). Had the legislature intended the statute to apply only at a trial, it undoubtedly would have used that term.”

Reversed.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

2009AP1881 S.P.A. v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.

Dist. III, Washburn County, Harrington, J., Hoover, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Kurth, Patti J., Milwaukee; Schmeckpeper, Jeffrey A.,Milwaukee; For Respondent: Ball, Stephanie A., Duluth, MN

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests