Modification; new factors
Joseph Eckstein, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Eckstein argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an excessive sentence; (2) the court erred by denying his motion for sentence modification without a hearing; and (3) the Parole Commission’s denial of his parole is a new factor warranting sentence modification. We reject these arguments and affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein
Dist III, Brown County, Zuidmulder, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Eckstein, Joseph H., pro se; For Respondent: Zakowski, John P., Green Bay; Kinnunen, Erik, Madison