Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein

2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein

Sentencing Modification; new factors Joseph Eckstein, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Eckstein argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an excessive sentence; (2) the court erred by denying his motion for sentence modification without a hearing; and (3) the Parole Commission’s denial of his parole is a ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*