2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 25, 2011//

Listen to this article

Sentencing
Modification; new factors

Joseph Eckstein, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Eckstein argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an excessive sentence; (2) the court erred by denying his motion for sentence modification without a hearing; and (3) the Parole Commission’s denial of his parole is a new factor warranting sentence modification. We reject these arguments and affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein

Dist III, Brown County, Zuidmulder, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Eckstein, Joseph H., pro se; For Respondent: Zakowski, John P., Green Bay; Kinnunen, Erik, Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event