Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 25, 2011//

2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 25, 2011//

Listen to this article

Sentencing
Modification; new factors

Joseph Eckstein, pro se, appeals an order denying his motion for sentence modification. Eckstein argues: (1) the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in imposing an excessive sentence; (2) the court erred by denying his motion for sentence modification without a hearing; and (3) the Parole Commission’s denial of his parole is a new factor warranting sentence modification. We reject these arguments and affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP140-CR State v. Eckstein

Dist III, Brown County, Zuidmulder, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Eckstein, Joseph H., pro se; For Respondent: Zakowski, John P., Green Bay; Kinnunen, Erik, Madison

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests