Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 09-329 Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. McCoy

09-329 Chase Bank USA, N.A. v. McCoy

Consumer Protection TILA Regulation Z did not require Chase to provide McCoy with a change-in-terms notice before implementing the agreement term allowing it to raise his interest rate, up to a pre-set maximum, following delinquency or default. The Board has made clear in its amicus brief to this Court that, in its view, Chase was not required to ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*