2009AP3149-CR State v. Reed

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//January 11, 2011//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Judicial recusal

Henry Edward Reed, Jr. appeals a judgment convicting him of burglary and attempted burglary. He also appeals an order denying him postconviction relief. Reed contends that he should be allowed to withdraw his guilty pleas and/or should be granted a new sentencing hearing because: (1) his pleas were not intelligently entered; (2) the State materially and substantially breached the plea agreement; and (3) the judge who presided over his postconviction hearing should have recused himself. Because Reed has waived his first two arguments and has provided insufficient support for his third argument, we disagree and affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2009AP3149-CR State v. Reed

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Cimpl, J., Curley, P.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Loeb, Basil M., Wauwatosa; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Weinstein, Warren D., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event