Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 2009AP3075 State v. Ryan

2009AP3075 State v. Ryan

Civil Procedure Judicial estoppel Where a party maintained it was the owner of property in an eminent domain proceeding, it is estopped from arguing it is not in a later forfeiture action. "We think that Ryan presents a textbook example of a litigant playing 'fast and loose' with the judicial system. See Harrison, 187 Wis. 2d at 497; ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*