By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 29, 2010//
Civil Procedure
Jury trials; judicial bias; interpreters
D.T. Kedinger appeals from orders denying him an interpreter based on trial court findings that he does not have a hearing disability and denying reconsideration of the judgment against him. He makes four discernable claims: that he was improperly denied an interpreter, that he did not receive notice of the trial on the merits, that he was improperly denied a trial by jury on the merits, and that the judge was biased. None of his claims are persuasive, so we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP712 Fond du Lac County v. Kedinger
Dist II, Fond du Lac County, Weinke, J., Brown, C.J.
Attorneys: For Appellant: Kedinger, D. T., pro se; For Respondent: Weber, Gregory M., Madison; Christenson, Andrew Joseph, Fond du Lac