Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

09-3714, 09-3923 & 10-1060 Opp v. Office of the State’s Attorney of Cook County

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 29, 2010//

09-3714, 09-3923 & 10-1060 Opp v. Office of the State’s Attorney of Cook County

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 29, 2010//

Listen to this article

Employment
ADEA; state attorneys

Assistant State’s Attorneys are appointees on the policymaking level and therefore are not within the coverage of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act.

“The appellants contend that Assistant State’s Attorneys merely implement policy actions on behalf of the State’s Attorney. We disagree. An Assistant State’s Attorney carries out policy on behalf of the government, and in doing so has ‘meaningful input into governmental decision-making on issues where there is room for principled disagreement on goals or their implementation.’ For example, an Assistant State’s Attorney’s decisions and actions in the courtroom are binding on the government. The State’s Attorney grants an Assistant State’s Attorney the authority to conduct a case in court, and, from that point, the Assistant State’s Attorney acts as the State’s Attorney in all respects. The Assistant State’s Attorney may choose to prosecute or dismiss a case, with or without the State’s Attorney’s input and guidance. This alone raises Assistant State’s Attorneys to the level of policymakers.”

Affirmed.

09-3714, 09-3923 & 10-1060 Opp v. Office of the State’s Attorney of Cook County

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Bucklo, Leinenweber, Castillo, JJ., Bauer, J.

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests