Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2009AP2590 Daniels v. Wausau Business Ins. Co., et al.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 28, 2010//

2009AP2590 Daniels v. Wausau Business Ins. Co., et al.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//December 28, 2010//

Listen to this article

Employment
Workers compensation; credible evidence

George Daniels appeals from a judgment affirming a Wisconsin Labor and Industry Review Commission order. The Commission determined that work-related stress was not a contributory cause of Daniels’ ruptured brain aneurysm. Daniels argues the Commission erred by rejecting the opinion of a treating physician supportive of his claim. Daniels also contends the Commission relied exclusively on his supervisor’s testimony regarding work-place stress and ignored other testimony. We reject Daniels’ arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP2590 Daniels v. Wausau Business Ins. Co., et al.

Dist III, Taylor County, Madden, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Schmiege, Anne E., New Richmond; For Respondent: Hart, David A., III, Madison; Almazar, Jessica, Wausau

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests