Quantcast
Home / Opinion / 10-1304 U.S. v. Taylor

10-1304 U.S. v. Taylor

Sentencing Consecutive sentences Where the district failed to recognize it had discretion to impose sentences concurrently or consecutively, a limited remand is appropriate. "Although the supervised release policy statements were advisory well before the sentencing guidelines themselves were made advisory in United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220, 267, 125 S. Ct. 738, 160 L. Ed. 2d 621 ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*