Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility
Home / Commentary / Arizona-like immigration law would be wrong for Wisconsin

Arizona-like immigration law would be wrong for Wisconsin

By Jerry Grzeca

Jerry Grzeca

Jerry Grzeca

Rep. Don Pridemore of Hartford recently announced he plans to introduce an “Arizona-like” immigration bill in the Wisconsin Legislature when the new session begins this January. To put it bluntly, this legislation is wasteful, unconstitutional and has the potential for unintended racist consequences.

Wisconsin voters swept Republicans into power in the November election based on the promise that they would cut wasteful spending, defend the basic rights guaranteed by the Constitution and create jobs for Wisconsin.

Yet the first meaningful legislation proposed is not a jobs plan or an effort to decrease bureaucratic waste by the state government. It is one that would require cash-strapped local law enforcement agencies to divert already limited resources from investigating serious crimes in order to train officers and house, feed and babysit additional “inmates” who may have done nothing wrong other than cross the border without documentation (which is not a criminal offense) and possibly driving with a broken tail light.

It is not only local law enforcement that would be burdened by the passage of immigration-related legislation. The state coffers would be depleted as well. This legislation would guarantee that many viable and costly lawsuits would be filed against the State of Wisconsin by individuals and, likely the federal government. At a time when district attorneys are being forced to cut staff around the state and dockets are exploding, Attorney General Van Hollen would be required to spend millions of dollars to defend the state and its legislation in a case that it is not likely to win. Finally, municipalities and counties that are already struggling to balance budgets while providing needed services could also be sued for failing to enforce the law.

Quite simply, any immigration enforcement-related legislation introduced in Wisconsin is a waste – a waste of time, of money and of precious resources.

One of the key clauses of the Constitution has become known as the Supremacy Clause. Article VI, Section 1, Clause 2 essentially states that where the federal government has passed a law, the states may not pass any conflicting law or interfere with the federal government’s prerogative to enforce the law in compliance with its policies and priorities.

Undoubtedly, the federal government has laws (albeit ineffective laws) on the books regarding immigration. The Constitution requires that the federal government be given the deference to enforce those laws in the way it chooses. Even if the Wisconsin law were to claim to simply “enforce” existing federal law, the state does not, constitutionally, have the power to do so unless specifically authorized be the federal government to do so.

Any Wisconsin immigration law would likely suffer the same fate as Arizona’s law. This summer, a federal judge prevented the implementation of key enforcement provisions of the legislation, including the requirement that officers make a reasonable attempt to determine the immigration status of a person stopped, detained or arrested if there is “reasonable suspicion” that the person is unlawfully present in the United States because of the formidable constitutional challenge.

As Wisconsin’s new legislative majority works to protect and defend the Constitution, it cannot pick and chose. All provisions of this sacred document, including the Supremacy Clause, must be respected and preserved. Any effort by the state to legislate in the realm of immigration does not do that.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, any law requiring law enforcement to seek immigration documents from individuals suspected of committing a crime if they have “reasonable suspicion” that the individual is here illegally is inherently racist. I challenge proponents of the law to come up with any factors that could be used to determine “reasonable suspicion” that do not involve illegal racial profiling. Does Wisconsin, with its progressive roots and deep immigrant history, really want to become known as a state where a person who may have the “wrong” color of skin or doesn’t speak English perfectly is unwelcome?

While Rep. Pridemore is right to be frustrated with the federal government’s response to the immigration problem, his attempt to legislate it on the state level is simply wrong. His energy, the energy of other state legislators and Gov.-Elect Walker, and the energy of concerned citizens around the state, is much better spent pressuring our federal representatives to fix our broken immigration system with a comprehensive plan.

Jerry Grzeca is Managing Partner of Grzeca Law Group, an AV-rated, full-service immigration law firm based in Milwaukee.  He is a Director on the American Immigration Lawyers Association Board of Governors and a member of its Department of State Liaison Committee.

3 comments

  1. For those that are willing, there is a petition online that will be directed to the Governors of all 50 states, for the citizens of this country to assist in the detention and deportation of all Illegal Aliens present in our country.

    Please read the petition, sign it if you wish, but most importantly, please copy the URL and email it to everyone on your contacts list.

    Once the petition has been active for at least 3 months, all of the names of the people from your respective state will be forwarded to the Governor of your state.

    The action in the petition would be valid for only 2 years.

    http://www.gopetition.com/petition/40860.html

    Please remember, the Republicans have taken over the House of Representatives and have promised the enforcement of our current immigration laws.

    What’s most important about signing a petition such as this, is the fact that even if some of the ILLEGALS are not deported, they will be documented in the computer system as being here ILLEGALLY, meaning that they cannot participate in ANY amnesty program that could become available.

    I am just as fed up with people breaking the law just by entering this country, and I am willing to pay the 1/4% sales-tax increase to assist in removing the very problems that drain our resources.

    We cannot depend on the Kenyan-born Village Idiot, who now knows the meaning of the word “Trillion”, to stop spending our tax dollars in ways that do not help our society. We, as a nation, should be willing to tell our local governments that we are willing to help with the costs, so long as the money is used for this one specific reason.

  2. “Finally, and perhaps most importantly, any law requiring law enforcement to seek immigration documents from individuals suspected of committing a crime if they have “reasonable suspicion” that the individual is here illegally is inherently racist.”

    You people need to give this line of attack a rest. There is nothing racist about asking a n American, Asian, Mexican, Filipino, or any other race for that matter, to present their state-issued driver’s license when stopped by law enforcement.

    If a person has a state-issued DL or ID, that, in and of itself, is proof that they obtained it LEGALLY, and are present in the United States, LEGALLY.

  3. While I wholeheartedly support deportation of individuals who are in this country illegally, I cannot support a law such as that enacted by Arizona. Are we still the “land of the free” if the police can stop us at will and demand to “see our papers”? We already have to face the Hobson’s choice of submitting to nude scans or molestation by federal government goons when flying. Everyone knows that the police can conjure up “reasonable suspicion” for just about anything. One can easily imagine the police establishing informal “enforcement zones” in areas of a city they declare are “known to be frequented by illegals” or that are “known gathering places for illegals.”

    I sincerely despair for the future of this country when so many are so willing to grant government the right to violate their rights of privacy and personal integrity and the right of law abiding citizens to be left alone. American citizens should not be forced to prove they are not here illegally any more than they should not have to prove they are not terrorists when flying. Enforcing our immigration laws is important, but not at the expense of sacrificing our liberties.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*