2010AP1293 Godfrey v. Steiner Heating & Cooling

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 24, 2010//

Listen to this article

Contracts
Statutory misrepresentation

Marie Godfrey appeals from an order granting Steiner Heating & Cooling $2300 for the purchase and installation of a heater in fulfillment of a contract agreement with Godfrey. Godfrey, arguing pro se, claimed that she should be able to keep the new heater without paying for it because Steiner tricked her into purchasing an expensive heater, in violation of Wis. Stat. §100.18(1), when a less expensive alternative solution existed. Steiner denied Godfrey’s accusations and argued that it should recover $2300 for the heater and installation. The trial court ordered judgment in favor of Steiner. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1293 Godfrey v. Steiner Heating & Cooling

Dist II, Sheboygan County, Bolgert, J., Brown, C.J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Godfrey, Marie L., pro se; For Respondent: Andrews, David E., Plymouth

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event