Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

09-2960 Naik v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 22, 2010//

09-2960 Naik v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 22, 2010//

Listen to this article

Employment
National origin discrimination

Where an employee falsified his call records, summary judgment was properly granted to the employer on the claim that he was terminated because of his national origin.

“Here, BIPI put forth a legitimate, nondiscriminatory reason for terminating Naik. BIPI believed, whether wrong or right, that Naik falsified his call reports and Naik did nothing to really dispute the accusation. Thus, the district judge properly granted BIPI’s motion for summary judgment. We also conclude that the district judge did not abuse his discretion in denying Naik’s Rule 59(e) motion seeking reconsideration.”

Affirmed.

09-2960 Naik v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Andersen, J., Evans, J.

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests