2009AP2288 State v. Westmoreland

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//November 2, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Successive appeals

Paul Dwayne Westmoreland appeals pro se from the trial court’s judgment and orders denying his motions for postconviction relief and reconsideration. Because Westmoreland has not stated a sufficient reason for failing to bring his claims in his first postconviction motion, we conclude his claims are procedurally barred by State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 181-82, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994). Consequently, we affirm. Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

2009AP2288 State v. Westmoreland

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Flanagan, McMahon, JJ., Brennan, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Westmoreland, Paul Dwayne, pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Larson, Sarah K., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event