2010AP432, 2010AP558 State v. Sherman

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 26, 2010//

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 26, 2010//

Listen to this article

Criminal Procedure
Ineffective assistance

Stephen Sherman, pro se, appeals an order denying his Wis. Stat. § 974.06[1] motion for postconviction relief. Sherman argues the circuit court erred by denying his motion without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he received ineffective assistance of postconviction counsel and also argues new factors warrant sentence modification. We reject Sherman’s arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP432, 2010AP558 State v. Sherman

Dist III, Brown County, Dyer, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Sherman, Stephen C., pro se; For Respondent: Balistreri, Thomas J., Madison; Schneider, Carrie A., Appleton

Related Content

Weekly Case Digests

Weekly Case Digests – March 21, 2022 - March 25, 2022

March 25, 2022

Termination of Parental Rights

Jessica appeals from an order terminating her parental rights (TPR) to her daughter, and an order denying her [...]

March 24, 2022

Abuse of Discretion – Evidentiary Hearing

Willie Allison appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury’s verdicts, convicting him of three counts of human t[...]

March 24, 2022

Court Error – Postconviction Motion Denied

Robert C. Stryker, pro se, appeals a judgment of conviction for first-degree sexual assault of a child and an [...]

March 24, 2022

Divorce – Child Placement Order

Julie C. Valadez appeals from a judgment of divorce terminating her marriage to her former husband, Ricardo Va[...]

March 24, 2022

Sentence Credit

Tanya M. Liedke appeals from an order denying her motion for correction of sentence credit.

March 24, 2022

Legal News

See All Legal News

Case Digests

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People