Home / Opinion / 2009AP1245-CR State v. Whyte

2009AP1245-CR State v. Whyte

Evidence Confrontation Clause; harmless error Peter Whyte appeals a judgment, entered upon a jury's verdict, convicting him of second-degree intentional homicide. Whyte argues that the admission of hearsay evidence violated his right to confrontation. We conclude the error, if any, in admitting the challenged testimony was harmless in light of the overwhelming evidence of Whyte's guilt. We ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *