Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2010AP1324 State v. Barahona

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 21, 2010//

2010AP1324 State v. Barahona

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 21, 2010//

Listen to this article

Motor Vehicles
OWI; probable cause

Michael Barahona appeals judgments of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, first offense (OWI), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), and operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b).[3] He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of his detention and/or arrest. Barahona contends on appeal that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the evidence was not sufficient to establish probable cause for his arrest. We disagree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP1324 State v. Barahona

Dist IV, Dane County, Hanrahan, J., Sherman, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Piel, Walter Arthur, Jr., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Lu, Vanny, Madison

Full Text

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests