By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 21, 2010//
Motor Vehicles
OWI; probable cause
Michael Barahona appeals judgments of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while under the influence of an intoxicant, first offense (OWI), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(a), and operating with a prohibited alcohol concentration (PAC), contrary to Wis. Stat. § 346.63(1)(b).[3] He also appeals an order denying his motion to suppress evidence obtained as a result of his detention and/or arrest. Barahona contends on appeal that the circuit court erred when it denied his motion to suppress because the evidence was not sufficient to establish probable cause for his arrest. We disagree and affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP1324 State v. Barahona
Dist IV, Dane County, Hanrahan, J., Sherman, J.
Attorneys: For Appellant: Piel, Walter Arthur, Jr., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Lu, Vanny, Madison