2009AP2695-CR State v. Lipsey

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//October 19, 2010//

Listen to this article

Sentencing
Reconfinement

Samuel M. Lipsey appeals from an order for reconfinement entered after revocation of his extended supervision and from an order denying his subsequent motion for modification. Lipsey asserts that the circuit court’s order imposing the maximum available time for reconfinement was “unduly harsh.” We conclude that the circuit court properly exercised its discretion by considering the relevant sentencing factors when determining the length of reconfinement. We therefore affirm the orders of the circuit court. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP2695-CR State v. Lipsey

Dist I, Milwaukee County, McMahon, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Steinman, Rebecca, Milwaukee; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Noet, Nancy A., Madison

Full Text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event