2010AP913 Murray v. Mazda

By: WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF//September 28, 2010//

Listen to this article

Civil Procedure
Small claims; dismissal; motion to reopen

Sandra Murray, pro se, brought this small-claims action against Russ Darrow Mazda claiming in her small-claims complaint that Darrow improperly “topped off critical [brake] fluid [, which] caused contamination of rubber” in, apparently, the brake “master cylinder.” Her complaint indicates that she was told that by “Car-X # 4906.” Following a dismissal of her claim by the small-claims court commissioner, Murray had a trial de novo in the circuit court, which also dismissed her claim, and denied her motion to re-open. She appeals that dismissal and, we assume, the circuit court’s order denying her motion to re-open. This opinion will not be published.

2010AP913 Murray v. Mazda

Dist I, Milwaukee County, Siefert, J., Fine, J.

Attorneys: For Appellant: Murray, Sandra, pro se; For Respondent: McCollister, Danielle R., Waukesha

Full text

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event