2009AP2628 In re the marriage of: Radix v. Radix

Listen to this article

Family
Property division; maintenance

Heidi Haugen appeals from a divorce judgment dividing marital property and setting maintenance. Haugen argues that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion in: (1) valuing the business property awarded to Douglas Radix by allowing depreciation for repairs and the market downturn, while not reducing the value of residential property awarded to Haugen; (2) granting Radix’s motion to exclude Haugen’s expert valuation of the family auto business at a continued hearing due to tardy disclosure by Haugen of her expert’s report rather than allowing Haugen a further continuance; (3) ordering Haugen to reimburse Radix for a mortgage payment on the residential property that Radix made while the divorce was pending; and (4) setting maintenance based on the allegedly erroneous divisions of property summarized above. We reject each of these contentions, and affirm.  This opinion will not be published.

2009AP2628 In re the marriage of: Radix v. Radix

Dist IV, Jefferson County, Erwin, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Olsen, Daniel E., Jefferson; For Respondent: Weber, Jennifer Lynn, Johnson Creek; Zick, Vicki, Johnson Creek

Full Text