By: dmc-admin//August 30, 2010//
Evidence
Best evidence rule
Kurt Schmidt appeals a judgment of conviction for disorderly conduct. Schmidt argues the conviction is not supported by sufficient evidence. He also asserts the admission of digital copies of voice recordings left on his ex-wife’s answering machine violated the best evidence rule. We affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2010AP551-CR State v. Schmidt
Dist. III, St. Croix County, Cameron, J., Brunner, J.
Attorneys: For Plaintiff: Gregory M. Weber, Madison; For Defendant: Andrew John Laufers, St. Paul, MN