Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

2009AP2105 In re the marriage of: Arnold v. Arnold

By: dmc-admin//June 7, 2010//

2009AP2105 In re the marriage of: Arnold v. Arnold

By: dmc-admin//June 7, 2010//

Listen to this article

Family
Property division

Denise Arnold appeals from an order which amended a judgment of divorce on remand following Robert Arnold's appeal from the original judgment of divorce. Under the amended judgment Denise, who was awarded the parties' home, was required to pay Robert $85,140 for his share of equity in the home. She argues that the parties' marital property agreement (MPA) should have been enforced with the inequitable provision regarding the sale of the home severed and that the circuit court lacked authority to modify specific provisions of the original judgment of divorce. Robert cross-appeals the order arguing that the unequal property division is an erroneous exercise of discretion. We conclude that the circuit court made a proper division of the marital property and we affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.

2009AP2105 In re the marriage of: Arnold v. Arnold

Dist II, Ozaukee County, McCormack, Williams, JJ., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Bailey, Thomas A., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Neary, Willard G., Milwaukee

Full Text

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests