By: dmc-admin//June 7, 2010//
Family
Property division
Denise Arnold appeals from an order which amended a judgment of divorce on remand following Robert Arnold's appeal from the original judgment of divorce. Under the amended judgment Denise, who was awarded the parties' home, was required to pay Robert $85,140 for his share of equity in the home. She argues that the parties' marital property agreement (MPA) should have been enforced with the inequitable provision regarding the sale of the home severed and that the circuit court lacked authority to modify specific provisions of the original judgment of divorce. Robert cross-appeals the order arguing that the unequal property division is an erroneous exercise of discretion. We conclude that the circuit court made a proper division of the marital property and we affirm the order. This opinion will not be published.
2009AP2105 In re the marriage of: Arnold v. Arnold
Dist II, Ozaukee County, McCormack, Williams, JJ., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Bailey, Thomas A., Milwaukee; For Respondent: Neary, Willard G., Milwaukee