By: dmc-admin//May 31, 2010//
Sentencing
Modification
Mark L. Guman appeals from an order summarily denying his sentence modification motion. The issue is whether the trial court misconstrued Guman's sentence modification motion based on a new factor, as one challenging the trial court's discretion, rendering it untimely. We conclude that Guman's bipolar disorder is not a new factor; consequently, he is not entitled to sentence modification. Therefore, we affirm. This opinion will not be published.
2009AP1391-CR State v. Guman
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Moroney, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys: For Appellant: Guman, Mark L., pro se; For Respondent: Loebel, Karen A., Milwaukee; Sanders, Michael C., Madison