2008AP2694-CR State v. Murray

By: dmc-admin//April 26, 2010//

Listen to this article

Sentencing
Modification; new factors

Ricky James Murray appeals from an order denying his motion for modified sentences. He contends that he is entitled to resentencing on new factors, and because he was sentenced on inaccurate information. We reject his arguments and affirm. This opinion will not be published.

2008AP2694-CR State v. Murray

Dist IV, Green County, Beer, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys: For Appellant: Murray, Ricky James, pro se; For Respondent: Losse, Michael J., Madison; Luhman, Gary L., Monroe

Full Text

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event