Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Ginger Gates v. Samuel Goodall and American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

By: dmc-admin//October 6, 2008//

Ginger Gates v. Samuel Goodall and American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

By: dmc-admin//October 6, 2008//

Listen to this article

PERSONAL INJURY: $7,697

Case name: Ginger Gates v. Samuel Goodall and American Family Mut. Ins. Co.

Court: Dane County Circuit Court 06CV1732

Injuries alleged: Right shoulder, neck and arm pain

Original amount sought: $49,000 at mediation

Highest offer: Defendants’ statutory offer for $9,000, plus costs

Amount won: $7,697

Judge: Juan B. Colas

Verdict/settlement: Jury returned a defense verdict

Disposition date: April 1, 2008

Original filing date: May 25, 2006

Date of incident: Nov. 11, 2003

Plaintiff’s attorney: Briane Pagel, Krekeler Strother, S.C., Madison

Defendants’ attorney: Kevin L. Ferguson, senior staff attorney, American Family Mutual Insurance Company, Madison

Insurance company: American Family Mutual Insurance Company

Plaintiff’s expert: Nathan Considine/ Chiropractor/Middleton

Defendants’ expert: Michael Borkow-ski/Occupational Medicine/Waukesha

Defense counsel’s summary of case: This case arose out of a minor traffic accident on Nov. 11, 2003. Police came to the scene but there were no complaints of injury and the officer did not believe there was sufficient damage to prepare a Wisconsin Motor Vehicle Accident Report. Plaintiff left the scene and went to a restaurant for dinner. She did not seek any treatment until the following day when she went to her established chiropractor complaining of right shoulder, neck and arm pain. Despite being released from her chiropractor’s care on Jan. 31, 2005, she continued to complain of pain in her neck and shoulder.
After a trial, the jury awarded $2,697 for past medical and hospital expenses and $5,000 for past pain, suffering and disability. Plaintiff failed to present sufficient proof to get any future damages questions on the verdict.
In motions after verdict, the defendants asked the court to reduce the verdict by their taxable costs. The court granted the defense motion and reduced the verdict to $6,470 and judgment was entered. The judgment was satisfied for a payment of $6,546.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests