Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

In defense of law reviews

By: dmc-admin//September 1, 2008//

In defense of law reviews

By: dmc-admin//September 1, 2008//

Listen to this article

A recent post at Prawfsblog by Professor Adam Scales, who teaches torts at Washington & Lee, asks the question, “Are Law Reviews Useful to Lawyers?”

My own thoughts tend to correspond with his first sentence in the post, “Even to pose this question is to invite a degree of ridicule; the estrangement of academic law from ‘real’ law has been long and amply commented upon.”

That being said, however, the post is a reasonable defense of the position that law reviews need not be irrelevant to practicing lawyers and judges. He writes: “until one thinks about it a bit, it is not necessarily obvious that restrictions on out-of state wine shipments potentially implicate at least three different constitutional provisions that each enjoy a complicated background and relationship to one another. I would put such issues into the category of questions for which one might not even realize what the questions are (let alone their answers) without benefit of the academic perspective.”

I certainly wouldn’t say I consider myself sold, but he makes a good case in academia’s defense.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests