Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Final Revision?

By: dmc-admin//May 28, 2007//

Final Revision?

By: dmc-admin//May 28, 2007//

Listen to this article

“If I had to use one adjective to describe what we do, it would be ‘arcane,’” said Wisconsin Revisor of Statutes Bruce Munson.

For more than 100 years the Revisor of Statutes Bureau has been responsible for editing and publishing state statutes, annotations and administrative codes, as well as numerous less publicly visible tasks including indexing and archiving.

“The bureau has operated for 100 years and specialized in the business of editing statutes and code, as well as focused on presenting the information to the public in an easily understandable and comprehensive way,” said Munson.

But a provision in the 2005 state budget called for the elimination of 38 legislative agency positions and the Revisor of Statutes Bureau could be one of the primary cuts.

“Part of the implementation of the last budget called for a reduction in employees and a review of the legislative agencies led to this recommendation,” said state Sen. Fred Risser (D-Madison).

A drafted proposal would cut the five current full-time staff positions and about $1.78 million. The bureau had 11 personnel in 1990 when Munson took over as revisor.

On May 10 the Joint Committee on Legislative Organizations (JCLO), of which Risser is co-chairman, unanimously approved submission of the proposal as a budget amendment. The proposal is now awaiting discussion in the Joint Finance Committee, and pending approval will be attached to this year’s budget.

“It’s a very realistic thing and we’re not feeling very comfortable about it,” said Deputy Revisor Bruce J. Hoesly, who became aware of the potential closure in March.

Transfer of Duties

Should the Revisor Bureau be eliminated, its workload will not. The JCLO proposal calls for the duties to be split amongst the Legislative Reference Bureau (LRB) and the Joint Legislative Council (JLC).

According to LRB Chief, Stephen R. Miller, his department would assume the bulk of the revisor’s responsibilities. He also expected the transition to be relatively smooth given the LRB’s current obligations, which include the drafting of bills, amendments and resolutions.

“It’s seems a logical fit which makes a lot of sense,” said Miller, who noted that many states have combined drafting and revision departments. “This isn’t something to be taken lightly, but I’m confident we can keep the level of service just as high, and maybe even improve on it.”

With a current staff of 54, Miller did not anticipate hiring additional personnel to handle the increased workload.

The same would be true in the JLC, which currently has 28 full-time employees according to staff director Terry C. Anderson.

“The JCLO proposal would have us pick up publication of the administrative register which is a bi-monthly publication that lists any emergency rules or rules hearings and notices relating to the rules promulgation process,” said Anderson.

Anderson noted that the JLC currently is involved with the rules clearinghouse which is a legislative revue of agency rules and notices, so the additional responsibilities would not be completely foreign.

“We certainly feel we can take on the duties, if that those are the wishes of the Legislature,” said Anderson.

While both Miller and Anderson appear receptive to the merger, Hoesly and Munson have reservations, which extend beyond the potential elimination of their jobs.

“I haven’t seen a mass movement in opposition of the proposal, but there are questions as to how seamlessly the transition will be made, especially with no revisor personnel expected to transfer into either department,” said Hoesly.

Munson noted that one of the advantages the Revisor Bureau has is the ability to remove itself from the legislative action process, a luxury that will be difficult for the LRB and JLC, which draft and review legislation.

“It’s a valuable perspective because we don’t think in terms of being part of the institution,” said Munson “Our goal has always been specialized, in that we want to present the law to the public in an understandable and comprehensible way.”

If adopted in the biennial budget, the proposal would not go into effect until Jan. 1, 2008 so there would be time between its inception and adoption for training according to Anderson.

Still, Munson characterized the work done in the Revisor’s Bureau as a philosophy, not just a job.

“The work we do is learned over the course of years,” said Munson who joined the bureau in 1977. “There is no law school class or how-to manual to teach what we do. It’s a mind-set.”

Bar and Court Impact

Along with keeping legislation readable for the general public, the Revisor Bureau works with the State Bar and members of the judiciary during the editorial process.

Supreme Court Commissioner Julie Anne Rich encounters the bureau on a regular basis with regards to Supreme Court rules and said elimination of the department would be “a real loss.”

“The revisor’s office does a tremendous job and their expertise and professionalism greatly facilitates my work for the court,” said Rich. “I think it is fair to say that every individual or organization that submits a rules petition also benefits because the revisor is instrumental in ensuring that the petitions and any resultant rule changes are in correct form for publication.”

The Wisconsin State Bar has a vested interest in the Revisor Bureau’s as well. President-elect Thomas J. Basting noted that the bureau allows the Bar’s Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Books Division to access PDF files of the statutes downloaded from its Web site to update practice books.

Although the Wisconsin State Bar has yet to publicly support or oppose the proposal, Basting acknowledged the valuable services provided by the bureau and hoped they would continue.

“While the State Bar takes no position on which legislative support agency should provide this and other services currently delivered by the Revisor of Statutes Bureau,” Basting said, “we believe it is essential that whoever is assigned the duty of compiling and editing statutory changes into the Wisconsin Statutes have adequate staff and resources to do so in a timely fashion and that it continue to provide free access to files containing the statutes for all to use.”

If revisor responsibilities were divided, Miller pledged the LRB would work with the courts and State Bar.

“If this passes, we will approach the courts and the bar to see what there interests are,” said Miller.

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests