Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 04-4112 U.S. v. Hawk

04-4112 U.S. v. Hawk

“Hawk is correct that the district court erred; it should have made the necessary factual findings to support the advisory Guidelines range it used. Even in the post-Booker era, the first step in imposing a sentence is properly to calculate a Guidelines range. See United States v. Rodriguez- Alvarez, 425 F.3d 1041, 1046 (7th Cir. ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*