By: dmc-admin//November 28, 2005//
Accordingly, defendant, as the second wife, is entitled to the pension benefits.
Even though the husband’s cousin and a co-worker each opined that had the husband intended to change his beneficiary he would have done so, those opinions are not “specific facts” as required by Wis. Stat. Rule 802.08(3).
Judgment affirmed.
Recommended for publication in the official reports.
Dist I, Milwaukee County, Foley, J., Fine, J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Ellen H. Tangen, Milwaukee
For Respondent: J. Timothy Lovett, New Berlin