Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 2004AP2583 State v. Savanh

2004AP2583 State v. Savanh

“Vongrasamy’s casual remark on the telephone to Savanh, an acquaintance, plainly is not in the nature of either of the first two formulations, ‘ex parte in-court testimony’ or ‘extrajudicial statements … contained in formalized testimonial materials.’.... That Neuaone, an informant, overheard it does not transform Neuaone into a ‘government officer’ or change the casual remark ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*