Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Decline of the civil jury trial

By: dmc-admin//December 15, 2004//

Decline of the civil jury trial

By: dmc-admin//December 15, 2004//

Listen to this article

Bradley

“We are pretending to do business as usual. … I don’t think it is business as usual.”

Hon. Ann Walsh Bradley

The percentage of civil cases, which end in a jury trial, has dropped significantly in recent years. A Wisconsin Supreme Court justice indicated the change is likely tied to the increase in alternative dispute resolution, among other factors.

Justice Ann Walsh Bradley recently told a group of lawyers that in addition to considering the reasons the court system has fewer jury trials, it is equally important to consider the consequences arising from that change.

Bradley’s comment came during the Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers Winter Seminar earlier this month.

"What is the backbone of democracy, but our system of justice," Bradley said. "And core to our system of justice, of course, has been our civil jury trial."

During the past decade the number of civil cases filed in both state and federal courts has increased. The number of attorneys practicing law has increased. The amount of authoritative legal materials available has increased.

At the same time, however, the number of civil cases going to trial has not followed suit.

"It seems curious to me that contrary to the pattern of this trajectory going forward and upward, that the one thing that is central to the core of our justice system — the jury trial — is contrary to that trend," Bradley observed.

Referring to Marc Galanter’s study of civil cases in the federal court system, Bradley noted there has been a steady decline in the percentage of cases going to trial.

Galanter’s figures, based on reports from the Administrative Office of the United States Courts, show that the proportion of civil cases tried in federal courts went from 11.5 percent in 1962 to 1.8 percent in 2002.

Another study by the National Center for State Courts looked at 10 states from 1992 until 2002 and found a 44 percent decline in jury trials and a 21 percent decline in bench trials for general civil cases brought in the state court system.

"Wisconsin seems to be following this national trend," Bradley observed.

Wisconsin figures derived from CCAP show that in 1998 there were 906 civil jury trials compared with 616 in 2003.

Among the factors leading to the decline in civil jury trials is the "development and proliferation of ADR," Bradley said. Add to that is the fact that more judges are encouraging its use and that companies and government entities are embracing ADR options, and it’s not too surprising that fewer cases are going to trial.

Bradley pointed to other possible causes such as the increasing complexity of civil cases. As their complexity increases, it becomes more costly to take the cases to trial. At the same time, judicial management of cases is providing incentives for judges to encourage parties to resolve cases prior to trial.

In addition to looking for the causes of the decline, Bradley said it is important to consider the consequences.

Related Links

Wisconsin Academy of Trial Lawyers

Wisconsin Court System

"Whatever the causes are, I think we have to start examining and get more information about what are the consequences of the decline in jury trials," Bradley said.

First and foremost, the Supreme Court justice questioned the effect this trend has on precedent.

"My job is to write opinions developing the law in our system of justice," Bradley said. "How does it effect precedent when there are fewer and fewer civil jury trials and our precedent, instead, seems to be developed more and more on motion practice than on civil jury trials?"

She also questioned the effect on determining the value of cases. If fewer cases are litigated, there are fewer jury determinations to use as markers. The trend might also lead participants to question whether they truly received their "day in court."

Other effects to consider are the public perception of court authority, the effect on lawyers who have fewer opportunities to gain trial experience, and public education through participation in juries.

"To me, in some ways, it seems like we’re pretending it’s not happening," Bradley said "We are pretending to do business as usual. … I don’t think it is business as usual."

Tony Anderson can be reached by email.

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests