Quantcast
Home / Case Digests / 03-0610 Petta v. ABC Insurance et al.

03-0610 Petta v. ABC Insurance et al.

“Petta and DeValk offer no explanation as to why they should be entitled to compensation from West Bend for the vehicle damage, except to say Wis. Stat. § 895.04(4) authorizes recovery of pecuniary injury. Much like the funeral and medical expenses, we question how they have been injured by damage to Dayle’s car when Travco ...

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*