By: dmc-admin//May 20, 2003//
By: dmc-admin//May 20, 2003//
However, because we cannot determine, as a matter of law, the intent of the parties in regard to plaintiff’s placement as a teacher in a non-traditional “department,” we cannot determine whether the settlement agreement has, in fact, been breached.
Accordingly, because we conclude that sovereign immunity does not bar Klein’s action, but that there are material issues of fact about whether the Board of Regents breached the settlement agreement, we affirm in part; reverse in part and remand for further
proceedings consistent with this opinion.
Recommended for publication in the official reports.
Dist IV, Dane County, Foust, J., Roggensack, J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: John R. Sweeney, Madison
For Respondent: Aaron N. Halstead, Madison