02-1722 Cammarata v. Pheasant Run Partnership, et al.

By: dmc-admin//May 20, 2003//

Listen to this article

Joseph Cammarata and Patricia A. Cammarata appeal from the summary judgment entered against them. The issue on appeal is whether a stipulated damages clause can be enforced against the respondents, Pheasant Run Partnership, Eric M. Lentz and Katherine S. Lentz (“Pheasant Run”).

We agree with the circuit court that the clause was unreasonable, and consequently we affirm.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Washington County, Faragher, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: James A. Beaudry, Hales Corners

For Respondent: James K. Muehlbauer, West Bend

Related Content

Replevin-Lost Dog

Clarion Bannach appeals from the judgment in replevin that returned possession of a dog to Leola Voegtline, wh[...]

April 15, 2024

Unemployment Insurance Benefits Eligibility

For fourteen years, Jonathan Todd Morris was the vice president of finance and operations for his employer, Br[...]

April 15, 2024

Wisconsin Worker’s Compensation Act

After a workplace accident in 2012—for which Graef received worker’s compensation benefits—he continued [...]

April 15, 2024

Sentence Modification-New Factor

Gilliam was convicted, upon a jury’s verdict, of first-degree intentional homicide while armed in December 1[...]

April 15, 2024

Petitions for Guardianship and Protective Placement

Sarah appeals circuit court orders granting My Choice Wisconsin’s petitions for guardianship and protective [...]

April 15, 2024

Insurance Coverage-Definition of “Occurrence”

Meress & Associates LLC (“Meress”) appeals orders of the circuit court denying its motion for summary [...]

April 15, 2024

Select Region or Brand

Upcoming Event