By: dmc-admin//May 12, 2003//
Mary Ann Wendt, pro se, appeals an order modifying the maintenance awarded her in her divorce. She argues that the trial court erroneously determined that a substantial change in economic circumstances occurred when she sold her home and realized proceeds greater than those anticipated at the time of the divorce. Her former husband, Clifford Wendt, has not filed a response brief. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.19(3). We may reverse on that ground alone. Nonetheless, we have reviewed the record to determine whether it supports the court’s determination.
We conclude the record does not support the determination that a substantial change in circumstances occurred and we reverse the order.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist III, Polk County, Rasmussen, J., Per Curiam
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Mary Ann Wendt, pro se
For Respondent: Steven J. Swanson, St. Croix Falls