Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

02-0669 Beaver v. Mueller, et al.

By: dmc-admin//March 10, 2003//

02-0669 Beaver v. Mueller, et al.

By: dmc-admin//March 10, 2003//

Listen to this article

Albert and Barbara Beaver appeal a judgment dismissing their claims against Norbert Mueller. The Beavers argue the trial court erred by: (1) concluding that the evidence did not support their claims against Mueller; (2) “not going through the required exercise of making a subjective determination in deciding [their] motion for disqualification of judge”; and (3) sanctioning the Beavers under Wis. Stat. sec. 814.025 for pursuing frivolous claims against Mueller.

We reject these arguments and affirm the judgment. Further, because the trial court properly determined that the Beavers’ claims as alleged against Mueller were frivolous, we award costs and reasonable attorney fees for a frivolous appeal and remand to the trial court to determine the award.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist III, Door County, Diltz, J., Per Curiam

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Albert H. Beaver Sr., Barbara J. Beaver, Sturgeon Bay, pro se

For Respondent: Brett Eric Reetz, Sturgeon Bay

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests