Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

02-0583 State v. Keith

By: dmc-admin//February 10, 2003//

02-0583 State v. Keith

By: dmc-admin//February 10, 2003//

Listen to this article

“We acknowledge that at least two prior Wisconsin decisions seemingly support the type of analysis suggested by Keith. See State v. Slawek, 114 Wis. 2d 332, 338 N.W.2d 120 (Ct. App. 1983) (police officers outside their jurisdiction arrested defendant after observing him commit a burglary); City of Waukesha v. Gorz, 166 Wis. 2d 243, 479 N.W.2d 221 (Ct. App. 1991) (officer outside his jurisdiction stopped a suspected drunk driver). However, neither case holds that suppression is required merely because a police officer acts without authority outside his or her jurisdiction and neither case suggests any reason to ignore the well-established rule that suppression is required only when evidence is obtained in violation of a constitutional right or in violation of a statute providing suppression as a remedy.”

Judgment affirmed.

Recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Dodge County, Bissonnette, J., Lundsten, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Christopher A. Mutschler, Fond du Lac

For Respondent: Gilbert G. Thompson, Juneau; Kathleen M. Ptacek, Madison

Polls

What kind of stories do you want to read more of?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests