Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

01-2507, 01-2508 State v. Cherry

By: dmc-admin//February 10, 2003//

01-2507, 01-2508 State v. Cherry

By: dmc-admin//February 10, 2003//

Listen to this article

William S. Cherry appeals an order denying him postconviction relief. Cherry argues that the circuit court erroneously denied his postconviction motion asserting ineffective assistance of counsel without an evidentiary hearing. He contends he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing on whether his trial attorneys should have raised a multiplicity challenge. Cherry also argues he is entitled to plea withdrawal with respect to one of his convictions because there was an inadequate factual basis to support a conviction on the underlying charge.

We reject both arguments and affirm.

Not recommended for publication in the official reports.

Dist IV, Dane County, Schwartz, J., Lundsten, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: William S. Cherry, Fox Lake

For Respondent: Alan Lee, Madison; Amy R. Smith, Madison; Brian W. Blanchard, Madison

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests