Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

02-1592-CR State v. Dickey

By: dmc-admin//January 20, 2003//

02-1592-CR State v. Dickey

By: dmc-admin//January 20, 2003//

Listen to this article

Sammy J. Dickey appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) which was reinstated following a remand hearing. He argues that his rights were violated because he did not get an “adequate and meaningful” remand hearing given that the trial court did not consider the issues Dickey raised regarding “Double Jeopardy, confrontation, discovery violations, and the conflicting testimony given on remand as compared to what the jury was told.” We disagree.

The judgment is affirmed.

This opinion will not be published.

Dist II, Sheboygan County, Stengel, J., Anderson, J.

Attorneys:

For Appellant: Chad A. Lanning, Elkhart Lake

For Respondent: Robert J. Wells Jr., Sheboygan; Mary T. Wagner, Sheboygan

Polls

Should Steven Avery be granted a new evidentiary hearing?

View Results

Loading ... Loading ...

Legal News

See All Legal News

WLJ People

Sea all WLJ People

Opinion Digests