By: dmc-admin//January 20, 2003//
Sammy J. Dickey appeals from a judgment of conviction for operating a motor vehicle while intoxicated (OWI) which was reinstated following a remand hearing. He argues that his rights were violated because he did not get an “adequate and meaningful” remand hearing given that the trial court did not consider the issues Dickey raised regarding “Double Jeopardy, confrontation, discovery violations, and the conflicting testimony given on remand as compared to what the jury was told.” We disagree.
The judgment is affirmed.
This opinion will not be published.
Dist II, Sheboygan County, Stengel, J., Anderson, J.
Attorneys:
For Appellant: Chad A. Lanning, Elkhart Lake
For Respondent: Robert J. Wells Jr., Sheboygan; Mary T. Wagner, Sheboygan